Listen

Listen to this podcast or watch the video. CLICK HERE

Transcript

 DOWNLOAD PDF

  • 00:00:30 Introducing Peter Fraser
  • 00:02:00 Peter’s quest to understand Chinese Medicine
  • 00:05:00 Peter’s early battle with health
  • 00:05:20 Why Peter gave up Natural Medicine for good at the age of 50
  • 00:07:30 How NES differs from other health approaches
  • 00:09:00 The biggest eureka moment for NES Health
  • 00:14:20 How NES used Chinese Medicine to understand the body
  • 00:17:00 Finding physicist Milo Wolff and the idea of traveling energy
  • 00:22:30 Our body’s incredible self-regulating capabilities 00:30:00 NES’s extraordinary finding in the Quantum Field
  • 00:40:00 Thinking of Ourselves as an Information System
  • 00:41:40 How we are responsible for blocking our own energy 00:45:50 NES’s enormous support from doctor.

[00:00:30] Harry Massey: Welcome to this week’s Super Charged podcast. Now, it’s a particularly interesting podcast because, this week, we’re actually just gonna play a recording of an interview that I did with Professor Fraser — I think — about eight years ago, now; Peter, when he was both a mentor, and he was also our chief scientific officer of the company NES Health. In this interview, he basically really, really describes how bioenergetics is able to go beyond biochemistry. You’ll just get a sense of the depth of the research that we were doing at the time and his very unique look of the physics of biology, which is still today a relatively unknown field. He literally is one of the pioneers of this field. He’s a great friend and our business partner for 10 years until he died about five years ago. Anyway, I just thought I would … I think you will all really, really enjoy this interview. Just sit back, relax, and take it all in. Bye for now.

[00:02:00]Peter Fraser: 1973, I set up an acupuncture college, which, after 13 years of hard work, was accepted in to the tertiary college system as a university course – one of the first in the Western world for Chinese medicine. I promptly left, wanted a change of scene. It was then I started doing … There was a lot about Chinese medicine I just didn’t understand, even though I was teaching it for 13 years. I still didn’t understand it, so I began to research aspects of it that I was interested in.

Between 1983 to the present, I’ve been on this quest to try and sort out, once and for all, what on earth this alternative medicine is about. From the questions you ask, I think I’ve been there. It’s very much a journey over the last 30 years or so.

[00:05:00] : so. As a teenager and later, I did yoga. I studied yoga philosophy and I studied the Buddhist psychology, if you like, about mind and body stuff. This is way back, 1970s. You remember … Oh, you don’t; this was hippie days. That didn’t satisfy me. I’ve got this great desire for closure; I want things to fit. Then I found Chinese medicine, which began in Melbourne, and I became the principal of the college that I attended because I have a teaching background, degree. None of it made any sense because the Indian material in yoga and the Chinese material don’t fit, and neither of them fit with medicine. Then I found later on the quest was … Biology and physics, why doesn’t biology fit with physics? We have all these bits and pieces of material about us and our health and our well-being that don’t fit together. I couldn’t make … I’m very good at trying to fit something together – make closure, if you like. That’s, to me, very satisfying, to say, “Ah, at last we understand it.” What’s happened now, I’ve managed to fit a whole lot together in different systems of medicine from thousands of years ago to the present. I don’t think there’s a whole lot of medicines; I think there’s one medicine, but we don’t understand it very well. I include myself in that. I think a certain amount of it was, I lost a great number of teeth when I was a teen.

I was forced to go to dentists and have more and more extractions and so on. So, yeah, you’re right; I did have a reason. I couldn’t understand why I kept getting abscesses in my mouth, and then even 2003, when I met Harry, I still kept getting abscesses in the ears. It’s only 2008. Now I understand. It’s gone, but now I understand what was happening all my life from age 15 to age 50- something. So, I guess, yeah. It sounds a bit silly to you, but it was important to me. I wanted to know what on earth could be going on. It’s only 2008. Now I understand. It’s gone, but now I understand what was happening all my life from age 15 to age 50-something. So, I guess, yeah. It sounds a bit silly to you, but it was important to me. I wanted to know what on earth could be going on.

Like Harry, I manage to get chronic fatigue fairly badly.

Speaker 2: How’d you..

[00:05:20] Peter: At the age of 50, I gave up natural medicine, well and truly. I was so sick and tired of herbalists, homeopaths and hands-on people, and they say, “Oh, I can fix that. All you do …” People get tired of the outrageous claims and the silliness. I thought, “There must be an underlying framework that all of these things that work a bit are referring to.” There must be a big theory of medicine that includes Reiki, massage, taking pills, yoga, and so on, homeopathy, or this sort of thing. They’re all completely different, but what’s the same about them is that they’re all about giving information to the body. I can say that now in 10 seconds, but it took 35 years to be able to see it. One thing natural medicine’s got is a lot of theories, you see, but you’re not interested. To me, it either works or it doesn’t work. I couldn’t tell you how many ideas I’ve dropped – perfectly respectable ideas out of books about natural medicine. I studied books on herbalism, I

[00:07:30] : studied books on homeopathy, I studied books on meditation … It went on and on. I just naturally gravitate to it. I guess I was very disillusioned about the whole trip, because they talk such a lot of nonsense. They’re well-meaning, lovely people; they’re nice. I said, “Yeah, you say this works, and then you do it and it doesn’t work.” The thing that natural medicine lacks is this underlying framework and this repeatability. It’s gotta work in a substantial number of cases or people just say, “Yeah, it was just one of those things.” Anecdotes. If you get 100 people and 80 of them out of the 100 show significant improvement, that’s a scientific sort of a statement or premise of interest. With an [inaudible] treatment, we put them through a diagnostic matching test to see what they’re like. “You’re like this, you’re like that.” Every now and then, you hit one, say, “Yes, it’s like that,” “Yes, it’s like that.” We treat the healthy part of the body and leave the sick bit alone. That’s the opposite of what everybody else does; we treat health, not sickness. So you’ve got psoriasis, you say “Well, psoriasis usually gets on the elbows, knees, and maybe around the ears or something.” You treat the good parts of the skin and see what happens. You see, we can’t make any claim until we get a whole rigamarole explaining what it’s all about. No one can fix psoriasis. Everybody can fix it and it comes back next week. So, we took another approach and we said “Well, we’ve got the medical system that hands out drugs that are toxic to anybody at the drop of a hat or less. We’ve got a hospital system that takes bits out if they don’t work. Would you go to a mechanic with your Ferrari? And they said this bit doesn’t work, this bit doesn’t work, because I saw a guy doing a ride on a mower and he’s throwing bits out that it didn’t need.” And true a body can keep working pretty well with a whole lot of its bits, but I don’t see health as handing out toxic substances or removing bits that don’t work. I see it as making it work better than it was. And here’s this wonderful idea, we can change ourselves as people. We can develop and we can get over our problems and they disappear. They melt away. And we ended up talking about healthcare instead of medicine and they say “Well, we need medicine.” Get a broken leg or a broken neck or in a car accident, you’ve got to have emergency care and they’re very good, very devoted to that. So I don’t see the conflict. So we come down to saying “Well, there’s a certain number of people in the community who want to achieve more, get rid of some of their aches and pains and ailments and we can help them. We can show them
how to do it.

[00:09:00] : I think the biggest Eureka moment … I’m still having them, but we realized that the body’s more than a bag of chemicals. That treating of the chemical level is fine, but it’s as if what’s the use of talking to the employees when you can go to the head office. And we’re looking for the control system. Can we correct where the problem’s going wrong instead of the … if you look at me … if you ask me, the disease is a car crash. It’s what happened as a result and we need to go back 200 meters to find out what started the car crash. So, if you’re like why treat the

[00:14:20] : result, when you can get at the cause and the cause is by no means clear. And what we’ve done is try to use Chinese medicine and Indian, traditional Indian [inaudible] medicine, ideas. It’s very ancient and they’ve stood the test of time. They’re still going. And we thought we’re picking up clues from tracing ancient medical systems and finding a scientific way of evaluating them. Otherwise, if you haven’t got some way of testing something, you’re a philosopher. If you’ve got a testing … a rigorous objective test, you’re a scientist and I think I’d rather go to a scientist than a philosopher for health and healing. I want to know that something is being tried properly and evaluated properly. So, that’s what happened. The biggest breakthrough was finding in the middle 90s, 1990s, a way of … a tool for measurement for something that we’d been trying to measure for 80 years. The physicists didn’t know how to make measurements of the quantum field. So, they got elaborate mathematics devised by Richard Feynman and other great physicists, they’ve done it. We know how the quantum field works, but we still can’t measure it. And I think the greatest thing that we’ve done in 20 or so years of research is to find a way of how the field works, which will trick us into telling us what’s happening. If energy moves through space, it creates a field. Why it does this is because the energy is itself structured. And what we’ve been looking at … as Harry said, we’re looking at the structure of matter, which is in fact just energy in space. And believe it or not, the physics of space hasn’t been studied. They’ve studied everything else but space is full of waves. And we’ve found ways to evaluate what we think is happening in space because we’re getting into reactions of different fields. Can you imagine the complexity of the body, the number of inter-reacting fields that are there if the fields are the control mechanism for the body and the cause of disease. It’s so complex, it’s very daunting to know where would you start to try to sort it out.

And the beautiful thing the Chinese have already got it into categories today. Can you believe that we found out that ancient Chinese medical knowledge was spot on right, but just not expressed in a scientific way. So, you know, we’ve been kicking goals for years and we’re getting to the point now where we can put up our hand and to think we’ve kicked some goals here and maybe we can help with healthcare. That’s the stage of development we’re at. But we can see it’s got enormous possibilities that have been overlooked for a long time in our culture. It’s like Zen Buddhism. It’s being able to see things as they really are without pre-conception. Can you believe how hard it is not to have preconceptions about medicine and health? Because from the moment you’re born, somebody’s telling you “Oh, don’t do this, do this, do this, you know.” It’s brain washing. It’s just starting again from scratch is what I’ve tried to do. And with no pre-conceptions, you ask very basic questions about what is energy. Does it move? Why does it move? How does it react with other energy? And so on. We had to go back to very, very basic particle physics to get a paradigm to explain what was happening in … what we thought was happening in Chinese medicine.

[00:17:00] [inaudible] is supposed to be an energy channel. You say “What sort of energy is it? Why can’t anyone detect it?” This was the scientist’s approach. You’ve got to say what the energy is. Is it electro-magnetic? Is it magnetic? Is there some sort of quantum field? Is it electrical? Is it photonic? That’s the only energies there are. I’m sorry, that’s it. The first thing we discovered was there was no mysterious life energy that the physicists haven’t discovered yet. That was all Chi, the life energy, no. So, that was one big theory down the drain. And we said, but there’s something about quantum physics that looks really interesting. We know we can’t detect a physical energy channel in the body. We don’t have any device to measure it or track it because we don’t know what the energy is and we started there. What kind of energy is traveling through the body that’s supposed to be the control system? And if so, how would we measure it? And it was a long series of fortuitous events that led us towards finding physicists existing … two or three big physicists who are on our side, who are saying what we’re saying. That agree with my own observations. And this happened recently.

We finally found Milo Wolff, a physicist in America whose idea of the structure of the atom enabled us to have energy traveling from one place to another between people, around people, out into space, and so on.

We got a connected view of the universe that means information is everywhere and is available. Physicists and chemists, biophysicists, don’t like action at a distant much, because it requires a field theory and that’s a bit hard. In order to get chemistry to work, you’ve got to get the atoms, molecules have to be next to each other and this clearly cannot be so if there’s a control system that’s got to work at a distance. You’ve got to have every cell of the body has to know what every other cell is doing. And it’s not going to say “Hello, Charlie. This is happening here and then nudge the next one and nudge the next one, so many billion cells.” It’s got to be instantaneous. In other words, it can’t be chemical. Chemistry’s too slow. So we come back to the field theory of biology, which was popular in the 1920s and it was dropped because the chemical company said “We’re going for a chemical model of the body.” And the doctors decided yeah, that’s all right. The laws of physics take precedence over the laws of chemistry.

That’s a big statement and I think most scientists would agree, unless you’re a chemist. So everything has to obey the laws of energy, which is physics. And that includes chemistry. So, yeah, it’s a technical … it’s sort of an in thing. You have to know that the physics is the boss. And the chemistry has to do what is possible in physics. And then we found that modern medicine and modern biochemistry doesn’t match back to physics. It’s like two different worlds, as you say. Surely, one’s this and one’s that. But one must control the other according to structure of matter. Chemistry can only do what is in the rule book. The rule book is the physics. You see what I mean? And trying to find a doctor who knew any physics, let alone they know biochemistry, that’s all they’re taught. It’s not their fault. So what we’re seeing is maybe over specialization has caused this

[00:22:30] : appalling problem where biology and physics don’t match up. And we’re saying, “Well they’ve got to match up if there’s a control system. And if we find a control system, it’s going to be a physics field control system and I’m not a physicist. I’m an old school teacher that got into Chinese medicine. I had to sit up late in the night reading physics books that were sort of door stoppers. Big words. And I could find nothing in the physics book for years that matched what I could see happening in my experiments using Chinese medical experiments.

Finally, we finally found Feynman and inter-reactions … Feynman is about reactions of light with electron and inter-reactions of energy between particles. And it might seem a long shot, this having anything to do with medicine, but it makes a field. It makes something called a quantum electro-dynamic field. We said “Yeah, because I’ve done experiments showing we could block … we get the field.” I found out how to set up a QED field. Have you ever thought why we don’t get too hot and burn up? How is it that the body manages to keep its temperature … if your core temperature changes by one degree Centigrade, more about 1.5, you die. How does the body, night and day, and fair weather and foul, manage to adjust the body’s temperature to within one degree for 70 or 80 years? I don’t think anyone knows how the body regulates its temperature and I don’t think … you know, we’re talking about basics. How does the body regulate its blood pressure, it’s temperature, it’s Ph, and your heart rate? All the big ones. And they say ” Oh, it’s the mid-brain.” This was the normal neurological response. And what controls the mid-brain? Do you remember that picture of the elephant supporting the Earth and then one bright spark in Ancient Greece said “Yeah, but what’s supporting the elephants?” And they said “It’s another set of elephants?” So it’s one of those. You’ve got to say “Supposing we don’t have elephants?” And say “Well, what is controlling the mid-brain?” And then you say “Well, I don’t know.” You’ve got to get something that’s autocephalus. Can I say auto-cephalus? It means having its own brain. Having its own head. Our bodies adjust themselves. They don’t need that much. We need to refer to outside. But our body adjusts its own Ph, its own temperature, its own blood pressure, and so on. It knows when to stop growing and when to start.

And it’s like … How does it know? What is the … and until now everybody said “Oh, genes, you know.” It doesn’t appear as if the geneticist are able to give us enough to convince us that, that is the control system. And more and more, I’m convinced that it’s not the control system of the body. It’s the library of the body to remember how to make 200,000 proteins. That’s not the same as remembering the mechanism for adjustment, very fine adjustments of temperature and pressure over your life span. So we went for a field, which is able to do things long distance. The only kind of field we could find that measured up … people think “Oh, yeah we’ve got an electrical field and a lot of works been done on that for 40 years on the electrical characteristic of the body. It’s not an electrical field that we’ve found that, that’s not enough to

[00:30:00] : explain it all. It’s got to have information in it. It’s the information there’s the control. And the field is the carrier. So what we’re saying hasn’t been said before. We’re saying to get a medical system to go, you’ve got to have a carrier and you’ve got to have information. Energy and information together means control system. It’s not easy stuff.

We were lucky enough to get clues about the details of the control system straight out of a physics experiment that I did that actually Harry put me up to. A fairly far out experiment, he suggested. Turned out he was right. Now, all of this sounds like something out of fantasy land. And so we do the ultimate test in science. Is does it work? And so, I’ve got a big rubbish bin full of bottles of things that didn’t work. I’ve got tons of things. Every now and then you’d find something interesting and you keep with that. So the big test, does it work? If it doesn’t work, I dropped it. And I’ve been dropping things for 30 years that didn’t work. And we’re left with a very small proportion of things that have an effect. So I’m saying this is all work done on trial and error. And that is a monumental effort of testing over years and years. The independent scientists are going to ask for an objective measurement. And you know how there’s always a catch-22, particularly with something new. Since 1923 when quantum physics was born, there’s been no way of adequately measuring what’s happening. And in fact, they’ve put … since 1923 to about 1984 with Richard Feynman, he developed a mathematical model for predicting what was happening, but no one can measure it directly.

If you can’t measure, you haven’t got any data, you haven’t got any science. You see, our problem we were up against a baffling problem of quantum physics. I became certain that it was a quantum field and what was that. And I read everything I could about it. All of the millions of cells in the body have to be regulated in a time space of your life. Within very narrow parameters or you die. How is it that from the tip of your toe to the top of your head there is some information that all the cells are getting? That is keeping it exactly right. To sustain life. And the medical traditional idea is that it’s hormones and enzymes.

You know how long it takes enzymes and hormones to get from here to there? Minutes. We’ve got to have an instantaneous control system that is able to adjust very finely and we found interestingly enough, the biologists have found that all the processes in the body are like a gradual switch. You know you get the switches just on or off. Two positions. The body is not like that. It turns off gradually. Can you imagine what sort of mechanism is required to get a switch from full on to full off? That’s pretty sophisticated and your body does it with all the major activities of your body. How is this possible? What is the mechanism? And then, the problems we had were immense because you only get a field when you get energy moving from one spot to another. And no field if it’s stationary. And then we found “Ah-ha, we found a physicist who says that matter puts out a field anyway.”

Just by being there. And we said “That’s the one we want.” We don’t want the electrical field because we’ve got to have a zap going from here and zap going back. And, you know, we’d have to run it on a battery. I haven’t found any batteries in the body. I haven’t found any radio transmitters in the body. If they did, I’d think I was schizophrenic. And you see
what I mean? We found that the quantum field is exactly right for what we want and then the extraordinary thing is we found that when you get a certain structure of a quantum field, it has certain characteristics.

The extraordinary thing was we found the body was living off energy from space, just what is there. And that you needed the food because of what’s in it. Well, the extraordinary thing, everybody thinks we get energy from carbohydrates and fats and so on. Then when you look at the fine print in the biological textbooks, you find “Ah, it’s the bonds between the [inaudible] and H’s in the carbohydrate that the body … and the bonds are just magnetic energy. And I like it. We live on energy and everything else is to get the energy to us. So, I must admit I’ve spent many a night in complete despair and bafflement about how on earth could this be so? And how can the ideas of biology be so wrong? You know.

You shake your head and that couldn’t be right. I know we live on Mars bars. I know it’s really chocolate that we all want. And people don’t go running around saying “Oh dear, I need my magnetic fix.” You know, it’s not like that, but we’re reluctantly looking at these ideas as a possibility. The glorious thing is when we go back to Chinese medicine and see where do they think we got the energy from and they’ve got this thing called UR and they’ll source energy that comes from the air. Everybody knows how to turn the nervous system off. You have an anesthetic. Great. We need that for operations. Does anyone know how to make the nervous system work better? And here’s where we get the control system. In a moment of complete abandonment I’ve got … I did psychology at university and I remember you’ve got brain waves. I said let’s make a [inaudible] out of alpha, beta, gamma, and delta waves that for some odd reason the brain … the brain wouldn’t manufacture all these brain waves for no purpose would it? But I don’t know what they’re doing then. I said “Well, maybe that’s the carrier way, for a lot of information in the nervous system through the body field. Ah-ha.” So what we did was I got analogs and put them in, imprinted them into the medicine, into … we’re not allowed to say medicine … into the [inaudible] into the health device, whatever it’s called and bingo, we got amazing improvements in the activity of the nervous system with me, with Harry, lots of people.

And this is the first time anyone had made the nervous system work better. You can’t make the nervous system better by taking drugs or vitamin pills or anything. Because, nobody knows how the nervous system works. So how can you make it work better? And we’re saying “Well, the nervous system is obviously a key part of the body field because the nervous system’s got electric charge. You don’t get a quantum field until you’ve got an
electric charge and you’ve got electric charge straight down your spine.” Love it.

Peter: So we were developing … this is all complicated stuff, but the point was we got the nervous system to work better and we called it nerve driver because it helps the energy field of the nerves. And we didn’t do it by chemicals. We did it by low-frequency sound. Here you’ve got to have knowledge about how the field is structured, what the different frequency ranges are, if there is a frequency range, how strong it has to be, you know there’s all this scientific parameters.

And we thought all structures have a resonate frequency. We found in the [inaudible] Ancient Chinese textbook of medicine, [inaudible]. It says the heart is like an orb. An orb collects energy from space. It’s like a collector. It’s like a battery. And attached to that is this energy pathway called a heart meridian. And then the stomach is this different shape, a different frequency, another little energy pathway. So we went through the twelve major organs of the body and said “Ah, we’ve got a pathway going this … at a certain frequency range.

Then we had structure in the human body related directly to it’s … to what it looks like. It was beautiful. The Chinese did it 2,800 B.C. and I did it again in 1990-something, you know, it’s not new, but what is new about it is we can extend it and make it scientific so we know what we’re talking about. The Chinese medicine is very poetic and mostly impossible to understand, at least for the first 20 years. So what we’re doing is what science is about. Is refining knowledge and making it more accurate and so you can communicate it. I couldn’t talk to anyone about Chinese medicine. Something wrong with the Chong-Mai or the Dai-Mai is empty. Sorry what did you say? Nobody wants to know all that stuff. They want to know why have I got ingrown toenails or why have I got stomach cancer. And can you fix it? You see what I mean? We’ve got a long ways still to go before we can apply energetic medicine directly to a stated modern disease. Because we’re still back, still grappling with the idea of structure creating a meridian. Well, it’s pretty simple isn’t it. [crosstalk 00:35:56] It shouldn’t be there, so we take it out. That’s pretty basic. What we’re saying is a bit more sophisticated and saying cancer is a loss of control of growth. Okay, right? You say, but what is it-

Speaker 2: Control of growth. What do you mean by that?

Peter: Why do we look like this and not like somebody else? We’ve got a body field that makes us look like us and it keeps us looking like us all our life. So, loss of
control of growth means something in the body field fails and it’s got to be
linked to the DNA/RNA because that’s about manufacturing new proteins for
growth. So there is a link to DNA, but we’re saying well it’s maybe more of a
passive link and maybe if we can just correct the information system that’s going
to the DNA and back, we can affect the cancer in a good way. So if you’re going
to try an explain what you’re trying to do, you have to say “Your body has
forgotten what you look like” and that’s a good psychological one. Then you’re
saying “What do you look like inside?” It’s the mental mind set that has a lot to

[00:40:00] : do with the blockages that occur in the human body, but not all of them, but let’s not over look them either. So, yeah, that’s what I do to explain it and often these explanations, they love. They think “Oh, that’s what I’ve always thought.”

Well, that’s the trouble. They’ve come to me for health and they’ve got a lot of stuff in their head that has to go. And one of these is the big F. The fear. The fear is exacerbated by the health professionals these days. And I don’t think it helps. And everybody gets this fear. The extraordinary emotional charge … I mean you can die of alcoholism, nobody cares. You die of cancer and “Oh, awful.” People die of all sorts of things, but cancer’s got this big emotional charge because it’s an emotional disease. Wilhelm Reich said that 40, 50 years ago. It’s not new. And people still can’t grapple with the idea. During their 20s before cancer develops, the nerve to that organ starts behaving strangely. How could this be?

And yet we’ve known this for 70, 80 years. And it’s quite clear that the nervous system has a role, partly a role in the initiation of this lack of control over growth. But what indeed it looks like now is a massive drop out in the body communication system. And does the therapist say “Well, we soon have to get you back in touch with yourself.” Now what therapist says that? They start saying “Well, you’ve got to have Vitamin C and you’ve got to have lots of root vegetables” all this stuff. You know, I agree with the FDA. I mean have you ever spoken to anyone who agrees with the FDA before? The Food and Drug Administration in America said that cancer is not a nutritional disease. I might be the only person in the world who agrees with them, but there is nutritional things that can help you, but it’s not a nutritional disease. And I’ve been testing.

Well, since about 1992, I can’t find a link. No direct link. And then when you start saying “Well, what about sorting yourself out?” Your home, your job, your sex life, your marriage, why do you kick the dog? Of course, the shutter comes over. I don’t want to know. I just want you to get me better. And the way to get better is to go inside and see what the conflicts are. And that’s something nobody wants to do. And if you say “Well, look, if you don’t do this you’re going to get sicker and sicker.” And then you’re threatening them. You know, you’re in a … as a therapist, you’re in this position where you can’t do anything because they isolate them- …. I have to do something to you and I say “No, you do something to yourself.” And I think all those speakers that this weekend have been saying, you take control, decide what you’re going to do, minimize the conflicts, and find out about yourself. They’re the people who get better. You, as a person, are learning to grow as a person and when you grow you become healthy. You keep growing until the day before you die. I’m not sure about the actual day, but we’re talking about health as a growth process. As an ongoing way of dealing with the problems that come up. Why don’t you think about yourself as an information system instead of a bag of chemicals? You might get somewhere. Where are you getting your energy from and what are you doing with it? So I’ve seen people go red in the face and cry and break down and have

[00:41:40] : a moment of elation and happiness and when you get rid of the blockages, something dramatic happens. And bio-energetic medicine has been trying to do this for many, many years and you know what defeats it, from Freud and Reich and all the bio-energetic idealists over a hundred years, is ourselves. We block our own energy because of fear, it’s inconvenient, it’s embarrassing, loss of the feeling of who you are, and so on. And maybe, maybe just maybe, the new energetic system we’ve developed is helping them to get over that huge disability, particularly for males. Males don’t want to lose power, particularly in front of another male because head-butting. Males have to do this eternal headbutting to show the power of virility and superior equipment and so on. So what we’re saying is you’ve got to drop all that and go inside and feel what’s happening to your energy. And, of course, have you ever thought of asking the people who’ve recovered from cancer what they did? Nobody ever thought of that. Noetic Sciences Institute’s doing that. You know, wonderful. Instead of thinking new wonder drugs, like the people who got better, what were they doing? Were they eating lots of green vegetables or chewing up tablets or what exactly was going on and you find they often can’t verbalize what it was. Well, this weekend we had this wonderful lady who had the brain cancer who just disappeared over what was it, 18 months. She told us what she was doing. She was going inside and looking at herself and finding out about herself. The conflict and understanding the … once you verbalize the conflict it tends to melt away. You see what I mean? That our concepts about medicine are so different we decided just to call it bio-energetic healing and say well “If you go for bioenergetic healing, if you want to go for medicine, it’s a choice.” We’re saying well, what I’ve done is traced the mechanism for all these little therapies and saying it all belongs to a correction of information flow in the body, which is in a quantum field format.

You know. That’s why we got the red flag out. We’re yelling revolution. We’ve got a revolutionary way of explaining all of these different branches of bio-energetic medicine. Answers about, looking at knowledge, and sifting through, and finding out more about it and optimizing it, getting it to work better. So if we get something that works in a large percentage of cases, we’ve got something. And I accept that as something required by the medical people. I accept that has to be done. It costs a great deal of money so we said “How about institute?” And I believe we’ll get support.

So it is exciting in that now we’ve got … the sooner you’ve got the underlying science for all of these things, you can improve them and all the bits that don’t work, throw them out. Once you’ve got the science, you can get the technology and we just with the [inaudible] device I think we’ve just got a very primitive, the beginning of the technology that’s required to read the body field. We’ve already got the things to give to correct it, but we’ve got to get more accurate at reading the body field and making it work better. That’s a game. If you’ve got the science right, the technology can be fixed. Nobody’s ever done it and if we

[00:45:50] : get the results and we can information about the results out, which is what the Institute’s for, yeah, I see if it works, people go for it and find out what the theory is a bit later, which is what you usually do. So, yeah, I’m very optimistic that this will open a lot of doors. We’re getting enormous support from doctors in Europe and doctors in America because they’re sort of saying “Well, where do we go next?” You know. We’ve got to the end of intervention. We’ve got to the end of poisonous substances. What else is there? You know, and you have to bite the bullet and say “Well, maybe a lot of our theories weren’t right and we could revise them. Have another look.” And that’s all we’re asking. Is have another look and see if you want to go down the bio-energetic path. And I think there’s many doctors that are not very happy with their position in relation to more or less having to hand out somebody else’s products. They see themselves as an intermediary for a company. This isn’t what medicine is about. You see what I mean? So, there’s a lot of them pretty unhappy about what’s happening. So we get support from many doctors, right around the world.